{"id":4295,"date":"2014-11-21T16:27:12","date_gmt":"2014-11-21T21:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/?p=4295"},"modified":"2014-11-21T16:30:14","modified_gmt":"2014-11-21T21:30:14","slug":"effective-writing-isnt-necessarily-sparse-expression","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/2014\/11\/21\/effective-writing-isnt-necessarily-sparse-expression\/","title":{"rendered":"Effective Writing Isn&#8217;t Necessarily Sparse Expression"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s a lot of interest in the subject, or style, of minimalist writing \u2013 using the fewest words possible to make a point, have impact, be clear. Google the subject, and you&#8217;ll find lots of links to a yeasty (that is extensive, rather than minimal) debate. Within limits, being sparse is\u00a0admirable, so long as you communicate what you&#8217;re aiming to say. Ernest Hemingway was one of the early masters of modern minimalism, and his writing is gripping, whatever a comparative word-count with earlier writers might be.<\/p>\n<p>Efficient writing? It all depends on the purpose involved. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/Technical-Writing.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/Technical-Writing-300x175.jpg\" alt=\"Technical-Writing\" width=\"300\" height=\"175\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-4301\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/Technical-Writing-300x175.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/Technical-Writing.jpg 586w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>Good writing, actually, is a form of good manners. It&#8217;s an imposition on readers to confront them with verbosity, unnecessary words added for &#8220;show&#8221;. By now, that should be an inarguable literary principle. Good writing, though, isn&#8217;t always minimal writing \u2013 it&#8217;s <em>appropriate\u00a0<\/em>writing, well-suited to the characters, purpose or setting being presented in words.<\/p>\n<p>In the discipline of <em>technical writing<\/em>, we&#8217;d add the all-important element not merely of purpose, but <em>specific<\/em> purpose.\u00a0In providing instructions to readers\u00a0on how to\u00a0accomplish a given procedure both efficiently and safely you want to be as clear as possible. In a technical context, clarity often means providing necessary details and cautions, while in minimalist fiction too many\u00a0details or grammatical complexities might be considered an imposition on the reader.<\/p>\n<p>In effective technical writing, you want to provide <em>all<\/em> the necessary details, but in as economical, that is as <em>orderly, <\/em>not<em>\u00a0<\/em>necessarily as sparse<em>,<\/em> a manner, as possible.<\/p>\n<p>On Google, you&#8217;ll be lead, right off, to a post by Jessica Dang on her <a href=\"http:\/\/www.minimalstudent.com\/a-complete-guide-to-minimalist-writing\/\">Minimal Student blog<\/a>. She is devoted to principles of minimalism in living, not only in writing. But her &#8220;Complete Guide to Minimalist Writing,&#8221; runs on a bit, presumably what happens when you are highly enthusiastic about a subject.  <\/p>\n<p>Writing comes down to a style appropriate to the purpose and need involved. Excessively sparse instructions \u2013 we&#8217;ve all encountered them \u2013 can be frustrating, as annoying as plot twists we&#8217;ve not been adequately prepared for. In technical writing, you&#8217;re not seeking to create a mood or resolve a crisis, but to avoid one. You&#8217;re promoting a mode of safe, economical action, and that takes a fully appropriate body of words to accomplish. <em>\u2013 Doug Bedell<\/em><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s a lot of interest in the subject, or style, of minimalist writing \u2013 using the fewest words possible to make a point, have impact, be clear. Google the subject, and you&#8217;ll find lots of links to a yeasty (that is extensive, rather than minimal) debate. Within limits, being sparse is\u00a0admirable, so long as you [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-the-writing-life"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4295"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4295"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4295\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4304,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4295\/revisions\/4304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}