{"id":4831,"date":"2016-02-16T16:56:48","date_gmt":"2016-02-16T21:56:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/?p=4831"},"modified":"2016-02-16T16:56:48","modified_gmt":"2016-02-16T21:56:48","slug":"technical-writing-is-like-other-writing-done-well","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/2016\/02\/16\/technical-writing-is-like-other-writing-done-well\/","title":{"rendered":"Technical Writing Is Like Other Writing Done Well"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What <em>is<\/em> this craft of technical writing that we&#8217;re engaged in? And why should we be fussing with a question like this? Instead of defining our activity, why don&#8217;t we just settle down and <em>do<\/em> it?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/images-3.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4839\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/images-3.jpg\" alt=\"images\" width=\"259\" height=\"194\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4839\" \/><\/a>Well, you&#8217;re right, we could just get on with it. But definitions, even for words or activities we know well (don&#8217;t we?), are useful. They bring clarity and may remind us of aspects of a task that we&#8217;ve overlooked or would rather not be reminded of.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techwhirl.com\/what-is-technical-writing\/\">TechWhirl responds<\/a> to this question with a simple, three-word phrase. (See, if you get serious about something, you can simplify it.) Technical writing is &#8220;simplifying the complex.&#8221; Yes, that&#8217;s simple enough, but is it truly enough? When you head over to Oxford Dictionaries Online, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oxforddictionaries.com\/definition\/english\/technical\">four definitions are provided<\/a> for the word <em>technical<\/em> alone.<\/p>\n<p>TechWhirl notes that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics &#8220;defines technical writers as those who &#8216;&#8230;put technical information into easily understandable language.'&#8221; That&#8217;s simple and direct enough, especially for a government agency.<\/p>\n<p>Yet maybe we should note TechWhirl&#8217;s long-form definition: &#8220;Good technical writing results in relevant, useful and accurate information geared to specifically targeted audiences in order to enable a set of actions on the part of the audience in pursuit of a defined goal.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That whopper hinges on instructional audiences and their goals \u2013 presumably, accomplishing a critical task efficiently and safely. To act efficiently and safely, you need instructions that are clearly written and presented, along with being accurate. <\/p>\n<p>Simple enough, right? Yes, but first, you need to be a master of the process in question to write about it authoritatively and efficiently. Not just the process, but, equally important, the context in which it&#8217;s being applied. (We keep thinking back to our years spent working in nuclear power plants.) <\/p>\n<p>TechWhirl discusses a number of other elements, but they&#8217;re mainly on the order of fine-tuning. The essence of the matter is that a good technical writer needs to be authoritative and focused on his reader in pursuit of a common goal \u2013 accomplishing a task efficiently and safely. That, incidentally, is how Hemingway might have described his writing as well. It&#8217;s all a matter of context and being effectively other-focused.<\/p>\n<p><em>(The graphic above is from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slideshare.net\/sadilyas\/qualities-of-good-technical-writing-with-examples\">a LinkedIn SlideShare presentation<\/a> by Muhammad Ilyas.) <\/em>\u2013 <em>Doug Bedell<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What is this craft of technical writing that we&#8217;re engaged in? And why should we be fussing with a question like this? Instead of defining our activity, why don&#8217;t we just settle down and do it? Well, you&#8217;re right, we could just get on with it. But definitions, even for words or activities we know [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,3,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-technology","category-the-writing-life"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4831"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4831"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4831\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4844,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4831\/revisions\/4844"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.encoretechresources.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}